Entrepreneur?? What about a political one?

Have you ever wanted to become a entrepreneur but never knew how to start or where to start? Have you ever wondered where would get you a good return. Believe me there cannot be a better opportunity than this. I would sound utopic. But the condition of leadership in West Bengal is such that there is no one whom the common men can bank upon and look upto to give some kind of direction to the state. Most felt that if the CPI(M )goes, Mamata would turn Kolkata to London, but by now at least the urban well educated citizen who voted for the change must be despairing. From left the state has gone ultra left. From a state of bad affairs the state is going towards anarchy or should I say autocracy something close to monarchy where the king rules. In case of West Bengal it is the queen. So such people who do not have anywhere to go who genuinely feels that the potential of this state was actually enormous. The British were no fools to try out this state first. (Or is it the anarchy among the Bengalis was an easy prey for them).
So the opportnity is enormous. If  you would like to have a political career, come over here and form a new party. You simply need to be credible and show the people some light at the end of the tunnel. There is an opportunity for political entrepreneur. Come try your luck out.

~ If only poltics was so simple or at least as simple as economics/business.

The Velocity of Money

GDP is a function of velocity of money. The simple concept which was so easy for me to understand theoretically did not strike me more until a few days back when I was crossing the road while coming to office. I saw a woman presumably from a village (a lower GDP area) who was also trying to cross the road. Pedestrians who are part of the city life (Higher GDP area), could easily find a way through the fast moving vehicles:  they ran, they sneaked through, they maneuvered .The high speed/velocity of their lives has made them accustomed to the high speed/velocity of their external environment. However it was a difficult situation for the village woman, who possibly leads a laid back slow life.
So what is the conclusion. I would sound far fetched as I always do:
The faster your life gets, you run faster, and you circulate your money faster, which in turns implies a higher velocity of money. That should reflect a higher GDP. This is my way of interpreting why the country side would have lower GDP while the city would have higher. This of course would be a vicious cycle, where you would need a fast sports car to travel even faster, however you can only get that when you have a higher gross product.
A few more abstract analogies:
a)  India never had, in fact never believed of fast expressways. However since the beginning of the new millennium, once the economy started having high growth, the highways started coming. Although they are not of the standards of the Auto Bahns, you can expect them to be, as GDP grows.
b) Indians still don't live on fast foods and still wold prefer the ghar ka khana over the canned foods. Implication: We are still not anywhere near US. (Pun Intended)
c) If you remember my blog post on teleportation. Can someone tell me what would happen to GDP under this concept if teleportation is indeed achieved.

For all those who are studying macroeconomics I, forget this crap blog and get back to whatever your Gregor Mankiw says on GDP and velocity of money.

Valuation of Paul the Oracle Octopus

Oracle Paul has amazed me no end. So much so that the recent slowdown of my writing ideas got a sudden boost. No I am not amazed by its prediction power. Rather by the amount of interest it has generated among the football lovers, as well as the people who need a daily dose of the crystal ball in their life. I am amazed because while in lesser developed parts of India you do find people worshiping cows with two heads/five legs or asking the talking parrot to predict their future I did not expect the same from that "advanced" part of the world. And then this business idea came to my mind. I might become a millionaire if I am somehow able to buy Paul and bring him to India and start a prediction business. The amount interest popularity that he has generated means my advertising expenses would be minimal. I only would need to announce to the Indian people his arrival.
So how much would I be willing to pay to acquire Paul? Let me start this valuation exercise. Assuming Paul's current value is based on the revenue (Discounted Cash Flow) that  is generating/potentially can generate in Germany, I will start with a bid price that reflects this value. And his value to me would be the NPV  that I can generate out of him  in India taking into account the price that I will pay.
Paul's Value in India:(Ok My target market segment would be mid level SEC)
In month one of operation in India, I can safely assume that demand would far supersede supply. What I mean is I don't need to estimate demand in month one. Rather I need to see how many shifts Paul can work remaining healthy in a day. I am assuming 6 days of weekly work (26 days monthly) 10 hours a day which means 260 hours per month. Depending on Paul's mood I assume that he predicts once in 5 minutes (I don't have any historical data in this regard otherwise I would have been more sure, but 5 mins look reasonable). So he makes 3120 predictions a month. If I charge 50 rupees per prediction (Again my target class is mid level who would be willing to pay this much amount). I am earning 156000 per month. On the cost side I need to feed him. Assuming he eats 2 kg of chicken a day. It comes to 200 rupees a day. 6000 rupees a month. I would need a sales executive who would be paid 10000 per month. (Including his PF, etc). I would also like to rent a multiplex space. My budget would be 20 K per month including beautification and maintenance. So monthly I am making a net profit of 120000. Hey I am not stopping here. Paul is a celebrity, even to watch his prediction games, people need to pay. I charge them a ticket of 5 rs for half an hour. In a mall I expect 300 guests on weekdays and around 1000 in the weekends. Around 10000 guests in the month. Which means 50000 in revenue. I need one more guy for sales. Pay him 5000. . Another 5K goes in Prints. Net profit 40000. So my Cash Flow in the first month would be 160000. Not bad.  I hope this to continue for the first three months. Then the fad would die down. Assuming Paul has 50% chance of predicting correctly. I can hope 50% of my customers to come back again for service. Oh common Paul's success rate is 100% in the world cup, I hope he can do 75% for me. So for the next three months My revenue would be around 117000. By then I would fire my second sales executive and make viewership free of cost (which in turn would be a good marketing channel). So net cash flow is 101000. Next three months would 75% of these and so on. I would like to continue with my business for a year and a half and then sell it off, either to a dinner plate or to a museum/zoo. I won't charge for the sell of unit. (There should be a limit to making people fool).
Now about my WACC, I am really confused now. Frankly I don't see any risk in the project apart from that the government takes up my case and bits the hell out of me. However the only way to find Beta for the project is through similar ventures. Has there been any similar venture? I doubt. Still I want to go ahead and take WACC = 15%.
Now what do I offer the current owner? I need a professional in Germany who can value him for me. But then he would charge me a whopping amount of money. I stick to trial and error.10000 Euro. Reasonable? After the calculation I find that NPV of Paul in the Indian market is 605857 and IRR 17%. Not impressive but then this is a very simple business case where Paul is made to sit at a particular location. If he is allowed t make an Indian tour. He would be worth in billions. Someone willing to try that valuation exercise out???

Vegetarianism

Let me start this blog by stating:
- No Offense Meant - No Religious Sentiment Meant to be Hurt -
I am not inducing a fight between vegetarians and non-vegetarians. Just wondering why people crave for vegetarianism. So what are the benefits of being vegetarian. Health green food, high fiber, low calorie, green lifestyle, healthy lifestyle.......
Don't you get all these benefits of being a non-vegetarian. One might say, meat is one of the causes of high cholesterol & consequent heart disease. All points for vegetarianism and against non-vegetarians accepted. But let me give one example. In the animal kingdom, the king of the jungle is a non-vegetarian or should I say a pure non-vegetarian. Where does he get all his fibers, high value food?? Does he have high cholesterol, any heart disease? He never takes any green leafy vegetable. Last time I heard that a tiger can carry a dead cow by his mouth for miles without resting, without letting the animal touch the ground. Pure strength, Pure Muscle. And this strength is not obtained by being vegetarian. Can anyone challenge my argument for non-vegetarians giving a counter example to the above mentioned point? Then somebody might say Human beings are not animals, they don't stay in the jungle. Humm!!! Though provoking.
Historically human races that have lived on high protein diet mostly on meat are stronger, better built, one of the reasons of Indians being of shorter stature is because of the lesser amount of protein in the diet. Ok enough of going around let me put my point. "Poustik Swatik Ahar" is not going to build on your muscle, your power.
This just came to mind. Does vegetarianism help in building a stronger mind, more intelligent people. Newton, Einstein, were not vegetarians. The Royal Bengal Tiger is one of the most intelligent animal and he is a non-vegetarian. I think I am crossing the line now. I should stop this blog before the animal right activists pull out their "dandas" against me. I am not against animals. I am for non-vegetarianism.

Cost Reduction Strategies I

Perhaps I have missed the bus. Few months back when every damn company was going through cost reduction/cutting my post would have been more apt. Actually this post would be apt anytime because my cost reduction strategy is not about firing people, reducing travel cost, etc. The strategies are more macro level, reducing the bigger redundancy in technology. May be a little futuristic.
Let us take travel: Air Travel. What is the point of carrying something which is not adding to payload. Yes I am talking about the power plant. The power plant in an aircraft weighs around 30% of the entire structure of the aircraft. And thus when the airplane is flying, you are burning more fuel to carry something which does not really want to travel or to go to that destination. You might thinking....Hey What the heck!!! Are you mad?? How is the aircraft going to fly without those power plants. Exactly that is my point in this blog of cost reduction strategies.
Can some innovation be made so that the power plant remains at the airport. The airport keeps getting energy from the power plant while in flight and reaches the destination without carrying the power plant. This is the modern concept of wireless power transfer. Think about the massive infrastructure set up cost, the wires, the transmission lines, the distribution centers that need to be set up in order transmit electricity from the generating stations to the end users. You need to step up the voltage through transformers, and know not what else, suffer massive maintenance costs. Why do you need all this?? Cannot energy be transferred without wires & cables. Can we not have a source & a receiver something like two mobile phones, where one mobile phone is the generator and the other is the aircraft or the end user would be using the power. Thus electricity would be transmitting on its own through the air and reach the receiver.
In fact  such technology is upcoming & more on the development stage. MIT professors have developed a technology by which you can charge your mobile phones without connecting to the power source. You keep them on the table and they get automatically charged from the power sources in your home. Wireless Power Transfer. But certainly the amount of power required in charging a mobile phone is much less than what is required to run an aircraft. Moreover the distance by which this charging is to be done is way smaller in the mobile phone case, because the distance between the power source and the mobile is within your home. But in the case of an aircraft would be thousands of kilometers. Hence it would take some time before this technology is applied to air travel.
However there is prospect that an electricity driven car would directly drive in to a power station. Just park their for a minute and get charged without connecting to any wire. There is substantial cost/energy to be saved if this technology really develops.

One More period of Slumber

I am passing a period where there are so many things in my head. And yes some of them are causing aches. I want many things to change but frankly have not seen a single window through which I can shout yes I can see the end to the tunnel. There are a multitude of things and I know things will turn good soon, but when is that soon. Once more I want things to fall in place. And this time I want them to fall in the proper place not in the way it happened after my final placement in IIM Calcutta. And this itchy condition is not allowing me to think through, hence the hiatus in blogging.

Food For Thought: Incremental Understanding

I accept Saurabh that the ultimate effect of this valuing up of the rupee in totalitarian would be inflation and nothing else ,
I get back to my previous view that the effect on GDP would be short term & in the long run everything production level comes back to the previous value.

However I stand by my statement that there would be a kind of utilitarian effect in the form that some wealth would be redistributed from the rich to the poor. The explanation is provided by taking a look at the classical Long Run Aggregate Supply Curve (LRAS). Whatever is shown in the figure is nothing new. I am only going to take a little help from the graph in explaining the phenomenon.
Initially there is an equilibrium and natural level of production is being met. When the rupee is valued up, as I said before people in the short term would not mind spending a little more. (Explanations provided in the previous blogs). This would increase the income of certain people who in turn would demand more and thus Aggregate Demand (AD0 to ADf) Curve would go up. Wages being sticky Short Run Supply Curve comes into the picture: resulting Y (production level) increase to Y*. Hence increase in GDP. But soon wages increase due to increase in price to the intermediate level Pi and supply curve goes up to SRASf finally everything settles down and a higher price level is reached Pf while production comes back to the level Y. Thus ultimate effect is there is no increase in GDP. However inflation happens.
Though I still hold:
1) There would be a redistribution of wealth.
2) Short term recession, consumer sentiment can be overcome by this phenomenon.
Then again why should a government take this ultimate step when recessionary cycles have become so short term in nature.